<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: beginnging to end of super bowl photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.adrianbischoff.com/2005/12/15/beginnging-to-end-of-super-bowl-photography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.adrianbischoff.com/2005/12/15/beginnging-to-end-of-super-bowl-photography/</link>
	<description>all the cool kids...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:28:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.adrianbischoff.com/2005/12/15/beginnging-to-end-of-super-bowl-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-4780</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogh.adrianbischoff.com/?p=383#comment-4780</guid>
		<description>Good article.  That&#039;s a lot of hardware and horsepower (in those days).  It&#039;d be nice to have that at your disposal.

I might try playing around with the RAW + JPEG and see if there&#039;s any noticable difference.  The 20D has six different settings.  RAW + (basic or fine)(small, medium, or large) JPEG.

BTW, do you know why my pingback didn&#039;t catch your link?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  That&#8217;s a lot of hardware and horsepower (in those days).  It&#8217;d be nice to have that at your disposal.</p>
<p>I might try playing around with the RAW + JPEG and see if there&#8217;s any noticable difference.  The 20D has six different settings.  RAW + (basic or fine)(small, medium, or large) JPEG.</p>
<p>BTW, do you know why my pingback didn&#8217;t catch your link?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy (not andyl)</title>
		<link>http://blog.adrianbischoff.com/2005/12/15/beginnging-to-end-of-super-bowl-photography/comment-page-1/#comment-4771</link>
		<dc:creator>andy (not andyl)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogh.adrianbischoff.com/?p=383#comment-4771</guid>
		<description>I think the RAW + jpeg, at least in cameras that aren&#039;t the D1X/D2H Prosumer cams, is mostly for convienence. The D70, for example, has a RAW + Basic mode, which takes the raw, and makes a jpeg suitable for web viewing.  I&#039;m not exactly sure what the size of the jpeg is, but I&#039;m sure the longest axis is less than 1000px.  I&#039;ve never used it, but it would certainly be useful in a situation where I wanted to take a lot of pictures, and immediately dump them onto someone&#039;s computer.  (holidays, etc).  

I remember reading that article when it came out - it&#039;s really impressive.  I think the funniest part is how much different their setup might be this year.  Faster server, faster laptops, newer digicams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the RAW + jpeg, at least in cameras that aren&#8217;t the D1X/D2H Prosumer cams, is mostly for convienence. The D70, for example, has a RAW + Basic mode, which takes the raw, and makes a jpeg suitable for web viewing.  I&#8217;m not exactly sure what the size of the jpeg is, but I&#8217;m sure the longest axis is less than 1000px.  I&#8217;ve never used it, but it would certainly be useful in a situation where I wanted to take a lot of pictures, and immediately dump them onto someone&#8217;s computer.  (holidays, etc).  </p>
<p>I remember reading that article when it came out &#8211; it&#8217;s really impressive.  I think the funniest part is how much different their setup might be this year.  Faster server, faster laptops, newer digicams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
